I Believe in Magic (In a Way)

Expanding the scope and meaning of theology is a personal and professional goal.

Thanks to Urban T. Holmes, III, my seminary mentor, I have always preferred an experiential and existential approach to theology over a classical and dogmatic one. The former starts with human questions, while the latter starts with divine answers.

Theology has always been concerned with supernatural beings. This makes sense since our species developed self-awareness and wondered about our origin, location, and destiny. We also needed protection from nature's unknown and frightening forces. We believed that spiritual beings that resembled us but were more powerful were in charge of everything. Different cultures gave these entities different forms, but their existence was taken for granted. Theology started when some people tried to understand and speak on their behalf. They could be considered the first clergy. But they could also be seen as the first magicians in an entirely magical world. Theology originated as the study of magic.

The word magic has many meanings and interpretations. It can evoke a sense of wonder, such as when witnessing a first kiss. It can imply a mysterious phenomenon that defies logical explanation. It can be a simple trick entertaining children, like your Uncle Joe's quarter act, or a spectacular show that dazzles millions, like David Copperfield's illusions. When I think of magic, I think of two of my favorite theologians, Penn and Teller.

I admire them greatly. I also regard them as theologians. As I mentioned, theology originated from the study of magic. I believe it remains so despite the scientific and scholarly advancements it has gained over the thousands of years since its inception. People still pursue it and offer it to others. The only difference is that we now understand its mechanisms.

Penn and Teller are masters of their craft. They have earned a fortune by satisfying our desire for a moment when logic and reality are defied, and the impossible happens. We long for that rare moment when we can escape from our lives' consequences, responsibilities, and limitations and see our dreams come true regardless of our flaws and limitations.

The word "illusions" is what magicians use to describe their tricks. Like David Copperfield, who performs his magic and lets you wonder how he did it, most leave room for doubt. You see it happen, but you know it can't be real. They tease your appetite for the impossible but never satisfy it.

Penn and Teller are different from other magicians. They perform some of the most intricate illusions possible, but they always explain how they did it. They acknowledge that magic exists but is a product of the human mind and perception, not a property of the universe. They want you to enjoy the beauty of the illusion, but they also want you to appreciate the self-awareness that comes with understanding how it works. They are theologians, in the best sense of the word.

We create and need illusions such as poetry, art, music, love, justice, and freedom. They are magical things that we make happen.

To ensure our survival on this planet, we need to be accountable for our religions, whether they are patriotism, nationalism, capitalism, militarism, football, Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, or any other. They are not supernatural. They do not originate from the gods. They (and the gods we revere) are our inventions—illusions we have created. They are our mirrors.

It is time for us to accept this reality and purposefully create illusions that will inspire us to achieve the best possible conditions for all living beings and the planet itself.

We have to mature quickly and get to work designing these masterful illusions now if history is to continue.

If we succeed, it will be the most fantastic illusion of all time. But if we fail, we will vanish like a playing card dropped into an illusionist’s top hat.

Everything matters.

WHP

 

Just Say'n...

I have been interacting with groups that advocate a rational and naturalistic perspective. Through this experience, I have noticed how the words we choose to communicate can reflect our understanding of reality.

My thinking is scientific. This means I believe that the only reliable way to know about our cosmos is through the information we get from our senses. Additionally, other people must systematically verify and analyze this information to remove personal bias.

I reject the idea of a supernatural dimension in our cosmos because no empirical evidence supports it. Likewise, I dismiss astrology, reincarnation, ghosts, magic, miracles, consciousness beyond death, or anything similar. I do not believe in a God or a mysterious designer behind the universe because the proven process of life's evolution contradicts the involvement of a designer.

I don't object to these popular beliefs based on personal feelings; I used to share them myself. But, I find no observable proof in the universe to back them up. I would gladly accept any empirical evidence of the supernatural and admit my mistake, should I ever find it

Because I think this way, and after reading the Humanist Manifesto, I have chosen to associate with the American Humanist Association. I find myself comfortable with them. However, to my surprise, some of them are uncomfortable with me.

The problem is atheism.

The third paragraph of this article expresses what many people would consider the essence of atheism. However, as a theologian, I reject the label of atheist. It would be as absurd as a geologist dismissing the reality of rocks or a biologist denying the existence of life.

I acknowledge that theos has historically been synonymous with God. We are beings who are aware of our existence. This makes us psychologically troubled by the question of our purpose—the reason for our being. This is a vital question that we cannot flourish without an answer to. Theos is whatever answer we discover to satisfy that question. I long ago realized that theos is more more than about divinities. Theos is about meaning itself

Our ancestors invented gods in the early stages of our cultural evolution to explain the nature, causes, and purpose of things. It was a sensible idea based on their limited knowledge of themselves and the universe then and for a long time afterward.

A long history of thinking that Theos is a supernatural entity of some kind does not oblige us to keep that understanding.

The human mind has created the supernatural and its various entities to answer the existential question. We needed the gods for Theos or the purpose and meaning that sustain our existence. However, as we learn more about the cosmos and ourselves, we leave behind the gods and magical thinking. Yet, Theos is still a vital human need. We must meet that need with our best intellectual, emotional, and creative abilities. Our well-being depends on how well we do it.

I reject the existence of God, any supernatural dimensions, or beings that dwell in them.

As a scientific theologian, I embrace the scientific view of the cosmos. I also have a rational, emotional, and theistic worldview. These positions are not contradictory.

Being opposed to something rather than supporting something is not a very good way to find one's purpose in life. But if someone feels such a posture is necessary, I beg them to find something besides “theist” to be “A”

WHP