A Theodicy for the Real World
The world is breaking our hearts.
Not metaphorically. Actually. Daily. The suffering of the vulnerable, the arrogance of the powerful, the casual cruelty of those who mistake dominance for strength—it is all right there, in plain sight, every morning when we open our eyes and our screens.
Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
And so, we do what humans have always done when reality becomes unbearable. We look for a way out.
Some of us look up toward a loving, all-powerful God who surely sees this, who surely cares, who surely has a plan. Some of us look sideways—toward the comfort of tribe and nation, the warm fiction that our people are the chosen ones, the special ones, the ones whose interests God and history have conspired to advance. Some of us look inward—toward numbness, distraction, the thousand small anesthetics that modern life so generously provides.
All of these are exits. And none of them work.
Not because the longing behind them isn’t real and legitimate—it is. The heart that cries out why in the face of suffering is doing something profoundly human and profoundly right. But the exits don’t work because they lead away from the only place where anything real can happen.
There is no way out.
There is only a way in.
The Oldest Escape Route
Human beings have been trying to escape the pain of reality for as long as we have been human. But it was a North African bishop named Augustine, writing in the fifth century as the Roman world collapsed around him, who gave the impulse to escape its most sophisticated theological form.
Augustine saw the problem clearly. The world as experienced simply does not match the claims of a loving, omnipotent deity. Innocent people suffer. Evil flourishes. Empires built on the blood of the conquered call themselves blessed. If God is good and God is powerful, why does the world look exactly like a world in which no such God exists?
Augustine’s answer was as brilliant as it was ultimately evasive. He subordinated raw experience to doctrinal commitment. When what we see and feel contradicts what we believe, he argued, we must trust the belief over the experience. The framework of faith must protect itself from the evidence that would otherwise falsify it.
This move—let us call it the Augustinian Maneuver—has been repeated so many times, in so many forms, across so many centuries, that we barely notice it anymore. It is the move that says, When reality and my framework conflict, I will adjust my perception of reality rather than my framework. It is the move that makes theodicy—the attempt to justify God’s goodness in the face of suffering—not just a theological puzzle but a survival strategy for a belief system that cannot afford to look too honestly at the world it claims to explain.
The cost of that maneuver is blindness. A carefully cultivated, religiously sanctioned blindness to the world as it is.
The Same Blindness, A Different Costume
Theodicy is not only a theological problem. It is a structure of consciousness—and that structure appears wherever human beings need to protect a cherished framework from the inconvenient pressure of reality.
We see it in tribal nationalism, which performs the same Augustinian maneuver in political dress. The nation, the race, and the civilization become the chosen vessel of history’s favor. Its interests become sacred. Its violence becomes justified. Its victims become invisible or undeserving. When reality contradicts the framework—when the suffering caused by our exceptionalism becomes undeniable—we adjust our perception of reality rather than our framework.
This is not a phenomenon of any single nation or political moment. It is as old as human tribalism itself. But we are watching it play out with unusual clarity right now, at a scale that breaks the hearts of people paying attention. The world’s pain is being subordinated to the comfort of those whose framework cannot afford to see it.
The blindness is the same. Only the costume has changed.
The Honest Demolition
It took until the eighteenth century for Western philosophy to mount a serious challenge to the Augustinian Maneuver. David Hume, with characteristic Scottish directness, simply insisted that experience is the only court of appeal. You cannot reason your way to a benevolent, omnipotent deity from the world as actually experienced. His Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion dismantled the framework from the inside using pure empirical logic—not with hostility, but with the quiet, devastating honesty of a man who refused to look away from what was evidently there.
Bertrand Russell carried that honesty into the twentieth century. When asked what he would say to God if he found himself face-to-face with him after death, Russell reportedly replied, Not enough evidence. Three words that collapsed centuries of elaborate theological scaffolding.
These were acts of profound intellectual courage. Hume and Russell cleared the ground that needed clearing. They bricked up the exit door that Augustine had built and that generations of theologians had maintained. They reported the water temperature accurately.
But they largely stopped there.
Clearing the ground is not the same as knowing what to build on it. Telling people the exit is bricked up is not the same as showing them where to go. Hume and Russell left people standing in the rubble of their demolished frameworks—more honest, yes, but not necessarily more alive, not necessarily equipped for the only movement that works.
They did the demolition. They did not do the construction.
The Way In
Here is what we have learned, slowly and at great cost, about the human organism and its relationship to reality.
We are not built for escape. We are built for encounter.
Every escape route—supernatural, tribal, chemical, digital — works the same way. It reduces the signal from reality. It turns down the volume on the world as it actually is. And for a while, the relief is genuine. The pain recedes. The questions are quiet. The framework holds.
But reality does not go away just because we stop listening to it. It continues. It accumulates. And the energy we expend maintaining the escape—keeping the framework intact, managing cognitive dissonance, and sustaining motivated blindness—is energy we cannot expend on actually living.
Think of someone standing at the edge of a cold lake, insisting the water must be warm because they want it to be warm, because a loving God would make it warm, because their tribe has always believed it is warm. Hume and Russell come along and say, The water is cold. Stop pretending. And they are right. But they leave the person standing on the shore, cold and disillusioned, with nowhere to go.
What if the answer is “get in”?
Not because the cold won’t be shocking. It will be. The honest confrontation with reality as it is—the world’s suffering, our own limitations, the absence of any supernatural rescue operation—is genuinely shocking. There is no point in pretending otherwise.
But something happens when you enter the cold water. Your body adapts. Your senses sharpen. You become more present, more conscious, and more in the world than you were standing safely on the shore arguing about the temperature. The cold that felt like a threat becomes the very medium of your aliveness.
This is not a metaphor for resignation. It is a metaphor for transformation.
What Theodicy Actually Teaches Us
The question of theodicy: why does God allow this? — is the wrong question. Not because it isn’t urgent, not because the pain behind it isn’t real, but because it is still looking for an exit. It still addresses itself to a supernatural agent whose behavior requires explanation, whose goodness requires defense, whose plan requires trust.
The right question—the question that opens rather than closes, that leads in rather than out—is this: what in us produces this?
What is the structure of consciousness that generates blindness to suffering? What is the formation—or deformation—that makes a human being capable of causing immense pain while feeling divinely justified? What happens to a person, a community, or a civilization when its framework protects itself from reality rather than engaging it?
These are not comfortable questions. They do not offer the consolation of a loving God who will set things right. They do not offer the comfort of tribal belonging to the chosen ones. Instead, they offer something harder and more valuable: the possibility of understanding what is happening and, therefore, the possibility of actually doing something about it.
Because here is what the cold water teaches us once we are in it: we are not helpless. We are not abandoned. We are not waiting for rescue.
We are the ones who are here. We are the ones who are conscious. Furthermore, we are the ones who can see—if we are willing to keep our eyes open—what is truly happening and what it requires.
The world’s pain is not a theological problem requiring a supernatural solution. It is a human problem requiring a human response. And that response begins not with looking up or looking sideways or looking away, but with looking directly at what is, with clear eyes and an open heart, and asking, What does this moment need from me?
The Sacred That Is Actually Here
There is a profound freedom on the other side of theodicy’s collapse.
When we stop waiting for supernatural intervention, we stop being passive. When we stop organizing our lives around tribal exceptionalism, we cease to be blind. And when we stop reaching for the anesthetics that promise escape, we become available—to the world as it is, to the people who are suffering in it, to the extraordinary and ordinary moments of beauty and connection and meaning that are present even in—especially in—an entropic and imperfect world.
This is what the great wisdom traditions were always pointing toward, beneath their supernatural scaffolding. Not an escape from reality, but a more profound engagement with it. Not rescue from above but transformation from within. And not the warm bath of divine reassurance, but the bracing, clarifying, life-giving shock of reality entered fully and freely.
The world is sacred not because it is perfect. It is sacred because it is real, and it is ours, and it is the only world in which love can truly operate—not as a supernatural force beaming down from outside, but as a human capacity, hard-won and freely given, that makes life worth living and the future worth working for.
We do not need a way out.
We never did.
We need the courage to go in—deeper into the reality of what is, deeper into our own capacity for consciousness and care, deeper into the only world where anything real can happen.
The cold water is waiting.
It will make you more alive than you have ever been.
* * *
Opthē is a naturalistic theological community committed to engaging reality as it is, transforming consciousness through praxis, and making life sacred through service to life and the Earth.
This article was developed in a collaborative conversation with Clara, an AI interlocutor provided by Anthropic. The theology and vision are the author’s. Clara helped give them form.